2016 (9) TMI 1268

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .R. For the Respondent: Mr.Alok Arora, Advocate JUDGEMENT PER: B.RAVICHANDRAN The appeal is directed against the order dated 12.04.2007 of Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of MS ingots liable to Central Excise duty. They were clearing the final products to various buyers including M/s. Tehri Steel Ltd., Dhalwala, Rishikesh. The Revenue .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the respondent company are also Directors of M/s. Tehri Steel Ltd. This is the only ground on which the Revenue proceeded to consider both the units as related parties for the purpose of Central Excise Valuation. He further submitted that there is no legal justification for treating two independent legal entities as related persons in the absence of any of the ingredient required for such trea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... atory requirement to establish the mutuality of interest in each others business. 5. We find no fact or evidence in the present appeal by Revenue to controvert the findings of the Original Authority. As such, we have no reason to interfere with the findings of the impugned order. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. [Dictated and pronounced in the open Court)
Case laws, Decisions, Judgement .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X