9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (5) TMI 499X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dvocate with Dr. G. K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Dhruv Seth, Advocates ORDER CM APPL No. 7139 in CUSAA 7/2017 and CM APPL No. 7143-/2017 in CUSAA 8/2017 1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No. 7140/2017 in CUSAA 7/2017 and 7144/2017 2017 in CUSAA 8/2017 2. For the reasons stated therein, the delay of 6 days in re-filing the appeals is condoned. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty to file appeal before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court within one month. 3.That even more delay was occasioned on account of reconstitution of Panel and the file was finally transferred to the present Counsel only in December, 2016. 4.That the certified copy of the order dated 27.11.2015 of the Hon'ble Supreme court was received by the application on 02.05.2016, where after the presen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iles after the order of the Supreme Court to the counsel for the first time, leading up to the filing of the appeal in the present instance." 7. Today, two months later, when the matters were called out, learned counsel for the Appellant stated that despite sending a long e-mail to the Department for the details for preparing the affidavit, he is yet to receive instructions. This itself shows how ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re is already considerable unexplained delay in filing the appeals and more than two months' time was available to the Department since the previous hearing, to file a better affidavit. 9. No attempt has been made to give a satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay, much less every day's delay, in filing the appeals. The Court, therefore, declines to condone the delay of 364 days ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
