TMI Blog2015 (9) TMI 1558X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1962. The counsel accompanying the petitioner would be allowed to be present at the time of interrogation but only within the visible distance but beyond the range of audibility - Petition allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - W.P.(Crl) 1897/2015 - - - Dated:- 2-9-2015 - Ashutosh Kumar, J. For the Petitioner : Anjali J. Manish, Priyadarshi Manish, Rahul Ranjan For the Responden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the adoption of third degree methods by the respondent authorities is that under similar circumstances and in similar fashion, his brother was noticed and when he went before the authorities, he was not treated well and was taken into custody. Mr.Satish Aggarwala, learned advocate for the DRI denies such statement or fact. He opposes the prayer of the petitioner. He points out at the conduct of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ring the apprehension of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to acquiesce to the prayer made by the petitioner. The petitioner would be permitted to be accompanied by his counsel to DRI Office when he next goes there for being interrogated under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. The counsel accompanying the petitioner would be allowed to be present at the time of interrogation but only w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
