GST Helpdesk   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
GST - Acts SGST - Acts GST - FAQ GST Rates, Exemption CGST Notif. IGST Notif. Exempt Income Salary income
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (6) TMI 746 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2017 (6) TMI 746 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) - power to issue SCN - Held that: - sub-section 11 was inserted under section 28 of the Customs (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2011 dated 16.09.2011, assigning the functions of proper officers to various DRI officers with retrospective effect - Later on, i.e. for the period subsequent to the amendment, the matter i.e. the DRI officers having the proper jurisdiction to issue the SCN or not had c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

x and then on merits of the case but by providing an opportunity to the assessee of being heard - appeal allowed by way of remand. - Customs Appeals No. 637-638 of 2011 - Final Order No. 53939-53940/2017 - Dated:- 12-6-2017 - Dr. Satish Chandra, President And Shri B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) Shri Sumit Gupta, Representative - for the appellants Shri P. Junena, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the respondent ORDER Per. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra The present appeals have been filed b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the notice was issued by the DRI. 3. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for the Department has justified the notice issued by DRI and made a request to decide the matter on merit. 4. We have heard both the parties at length and gone through the material available on record. 5. From the record, it appears that the preliminary issue emerges in the present appeal is regarding the jurisdiction of the DRI Officers to issue the show cause notice under the Customs Act. The assessee-Appellant had taken a s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated by the judgment of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Sayed Ali (supra), Notification No. 44/2011-Cus (NT), dated July 6, 2011 was issued by the CBEC, assigning the functions of the proper officer to various officers (including Additional Director General, DRI) mentioned in the notification, for the purposes of Section 28 of the Act. Thus, w.e.f. July 6, 2011, the Additional Director General, DRI was prospectively appointed as proper officer for the purpose of Section 28 of the Customs Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le Delhi High Court in the case of Mangali Impex Ltd. vs. Union of India [2016 (335) E.L.T. 605 (Del.)], and the High Court inter-alia, held that even the new inserted Section 28 (11) does not empower either the officers of DRI or the DGCEI to issue the SCN for the period prior to 08/04/2011. Thus, it is seen that the said order of the Hon ble Delhi High Court is in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. 10. However, it is further noticed that the said issue was also the subject matter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version