9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (6) TMI 937X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e for Appellant Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Superintendent (AR), for Respondent ORDER Heard the submissions of both, Ms. Stuti Saggi Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for appellant & Id. D. R. for respondent. 2. The present Miscellaneous Application for rectification of mistake dated 22/10/2004 was filed on 26/10/2004 and the same was rejected by this Tribunal on the ground that the period of 6 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ulating the appellants duty liability for the period from 01/04/1994 to 18/10/1994 for clearance of the goods to which exemption under Notification No. 1/93-CE dated 28/02/1993 was made applicable to the goods manufactured by appellant with effect from 25/04/1994 through Notification No. 90/94-CE dated 25/04/1994 by way of taking into consideration duty of Rs. 6,53,567/- paid during the period fro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /04/1994 to 24/04/1994 being Central Excise duty of Rs. 6,54,567/- to be deducted from the duty paid then it will be resulting in implementing exemption contained in Notification No. 90/94-CE dated 25/04/1994 from 01/04/1994 and since there is no such provision in the said Notification No. 90/94-CE dated 25/04/1994 for making the same notification applicable retrospectively. We do not find any mis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
