Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1972 (10) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , a firm registered under the new Act. On September 13, 1962, one of the partners, the father of the other partners died, and a new partnership came into being on September 18, 1962. For the assessment year 1961-62, corresponding to the accounting year ending with May 31, 1960, the petitioner herein submitted a return on May 29, 1962, showing an income of Rs. 23,947. The Income-tax Officer called for the accounts of the firm for scrutiny. On examination he detected some suppression. He found that the accounts disclosed only utilisation of two tonnes of tin plates while on May 14, 1960, there was a release of 24.5 tonnes of tin plates from the key loan at the bank. The balance of 22.5 tonnes of tin plates was not accounted for in the closing .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e under section 277 of the new Act. On receipt of notice of this complaint, the petitioner filed O.P. No. 6468 of 1971 to quash that notice. The O.P. was dismissed in limine by this Court. A writ appeal filed against that decision also met with the same fate but the Division Bench directed that the petitioner will be at liberty to move this court with an application under section 561-A, Criminal Procedure Code. Hence this petition. Various contentions were raised before this court by the learned counsel for the petitioner. I am here concerned only with the question whether there is any legal bar for the prosecution before the District Magistrate's Court either under the new Act or under the old Act. The jurisdiction of this court to inter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4) of the old Act, which reads as follows : " No prosecution for an offence against this Act shall be instituted in respect of the same facts on which a penalty has been imposed under this section . " The question therefore which falls for consideration is whether the petitioner is entitled to this protection and whether his case comes within section 28(4) of the old Act. The return in this case was submitted only on May 29, 1962, that is, after the coming into force of the new Act on April 1, 1962. Provision is made in the new Act for the procedure to be adopted in assessment proceedings for the period before the coming into force of the new Act depending upon the date of submission of the return. Section 297(1) of the new Act repeals th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessees have been classified into two groups : the first group is of those whose assessments have been completed before April 1, 1962, and it is provided that in such cases the penalty will be imposed under the old Act. The second group of assessees is of those whose assessment is completed on or after 1st day of April, 1962, and in their cases the imposition of penalty has to be under the new Act. In this case, the return itself was submitted only on May 29, 1962, and, therefore, it is clause (g) of section 297(2) that is attracted for the imposition of penalty on the petitioner. Section 28(4) of the old Act gives relief to an assessee from prosecution only if penalty is imposed under the old Act because the expression used in section 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... believes to be false, or does not believe to be true, he shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years ...... " The offence is therefore not only in making a statement but also in delivering an account or statement which is false. The account and statement made in this case by the petitioner are false, according to the prosecution. Whether an offence has been committed or not has to be decided by the trial Magistrate-I. It cannot be said that the prosecution is barred under any of the provisions of either the old Act or the new Act. There is, therefore, no merit in this petition. In the result, the criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgeme .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates