TMI Blog2012 (7) TMI 1028X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nst the order of Ld. CIT(A)- II dt.30.11.2010 for assessment year 2004-05. 2. The assessee has raised four ground of appeal with sub grounds. The sum and substance of the grievance shown by the assessee is that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by the AO in breach of the principles of natural justice, in as much as no sufficient, proper and effective opportunity of being hear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tune of ₹ 7,20,000/-. Further the AO also made an addition of ₹ 2,00,000/- on account of discrepancy in the closing stock. 4. Before the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee pleaded that it has not been given the copy of the statement recorded by the AO, therefore the assessee is not in a position to attend the appeal proceedings. However, on non attendance on the part of the assessee, the Ld. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ded by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. 6. The Ld. Departmental Representative strongly supported the orders of lower authorites. 7. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the orders of lower authorities and also the paper book filed by the assessee. We find that on 24.1.2007, 20.12.2007, 3.4.2008, 29.10.2010, the assessee has repetitively requested the AO to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
