2017 (11) TMI 1565

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . SIVAGNANAM, J. For The Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabakaran For The Respondents : Mr.K.Venkatesh, GA COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.R.Prabakaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepting notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petitions are taken up for joint disposal. 2. It is an unfortunate case where the petitioner has been compelled to approa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... writ petitions by directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation within a time frame. However, so far, no orders have been passed by the first respondent. Therefore, this Court would be fully justified in initiating action for contempt against the first respondent. 4. It is seen that subsequently, the petitioner gave representations on 29.10.2012, 22 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... heir superior officers are yet to approve it. Hence, it is high time for the third respondent to evolve a procedure, by which, individual officers will be personally held liable for delaying such admitted refund claims. 6. The case on hand is one such case where this Court can initiate action for contempt. However, considering the fact that there is a likelihood of the dealer being harassed in th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X