2008 (7) TMI 1043

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ounsel appearing for both the sides. Brief facts that are necessary to be considered for making the order that we proposes to make in this appeal are that the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Mumbai, on 18.7.2000 has passed the following order:- "The notification 42/98 CE (N.T.) refers the specified processed fabrics manufactured or produced. The word "manufactured" denotes the goods in r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d in the appeal filed by the appellant, the portion of which we have quoted above. Against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the case of M/s.Paramount Silk Mills (P) Ltd. & M/s.Paramount Fabrics Pvt.Ltd., an appeal was filed before the Tribunal. That appeal being appeal no.2560 and other connected appeals were of the year 2001. Those appeals were disposed of by order dated 21.7.20 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppellant are contradictory orders. In our opinion, therefore, the order passed by the Tribunal impugned in this appeal has to be set aside. In our opinion, the Tribunal will have to re-consider the appeal in the light of those orders in the appeals filed by M/s.Paramount Silk Mills (P) Ltd. & M/s.Paramount Fabrics Pvt. Ltd., and the stand of the department of not challenging that order any further .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X