2013 (8) TMI 1071

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi] - FO/A/ 57467-57468 /2013-Cus (Br)
Central Excise
-
Archana Wadhwa and Manmohan Singh, For the Appellants: Shri J P Kaushik For the Respondent : Shri Sanjay Jain Date of Hearing /Decision: 26.08.2013 ORDER NO. FO/A/ 57467-57468 /2013-Cus (Br) Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench) 1.After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit in both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pearing for the appellant submits that since the dispute revolved around legal issue, they did not submit any evidence to prove their case. They, if given an opportunity, would be able to substantiate the fact of passing on the discounts to their customers. 4. In view of the above submissions made by the learned advocate, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to Commissioner for f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X