2016 (10) TMI 1151

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Panda None present for the appellant. 2. controversy between the parties the parties was whether the goods that come out of the printing industry shall fall under Tariff sub-heading 4901 90 or 4821 00. Revenue says that the goods manufactured by the appellant was not a printed article and based on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Johnson and Johnson v. collector of Central Excise, M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 90 shows that the goods that come out of appellant's place of manufacture was a printing product, which is broadly covered under the phrase "and other products of the printing industry". This suffices to dispose the appeal with the reasoning given by the heading itself, that product came out of the printing industry cannot fall under the Tariff sub-heading 4821 00 but shall fall under sub-heading .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X