TMI Blog2012 (7) TMI 1058X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nsel Mr. Deven Parikh assisted by Mr. Mukesh Vaidya, learned counsel and Ms. Manisha Lavkumar for the respondent. 2. With the consent of the parties, we have taken up this matter for final disposal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the same point is involved in the present case as was involved in M/s. Supreme Glazes Private Ltd. in which the Tribunal has directed to deposit a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellant on the ground of under valuation of finished goods 'Frit' and clandestine removal thereof. The demand is also on the ground that the appellant exceeded the SSI exemption limit of ₹ 4 crores, subject to addition of confirmation of demand in respect of under-valuation and clandestine removal. Ld. Counsel would take us through the Order-in-Original and the allegations mad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and sale price during relevant period of said product and that there was no evidence. Ld. Counsel, is relying upon the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Vishwa Traders Others Vs. CCE Vadodara Order No.A/1846-1851/WZB/AHD/2011 dtd. 01.11.11, wherein the issue was considered by this bench. 4. Ld. A.R. for the revenue reiterates the findings of adjudicating authority. 5. On car ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e being reported, pre-deposit of balance amounts involved is waived and recovery thereof stayed till the disposal of appeals. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that in the case of M/s. Supreme Glazes Private Ltd., the CCE has demanded about 8% of the total duty liability, whereas the CCE has demanded 25% of the total duty liability from the pres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
