Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2010 (9) TMI 1231

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pectfully, the appellant filed a second appeal before the Hon'ble ITAT Lucknow Bench Lucknow on 22-7-2009. 2. That the appellant is assessed to tax within the jurisdiction of the ITO Range II Lucknow at PAN : AAHPO7013J and resides at 28, Park Road Lucknow. However, presently the business activities are carried out at site office 297D Salvation Army Road, Civil Lines, Bareilly (UP.) mentioned in Form No.36 before this Hon'ble Court. 3. That the counsel of the appellant Mr. Surendra Kohli Advocate (Tax Consultant) is based at Lucknow and his office address is 58, Hazratganj Lucknow. 4. That the case was fixed on 17-8-2009 before this SMC Bench and notice of hearing served at the Bareilly address fixing the case on 17-8-2009. 5. T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... formed after my arrival at Bareilly that immediately on receipt of notice the counsel reached the IT AT to be informed that decision has been taken ex-parte and advised for steps to be taken in the matter and hence this miscellaneous petition for sympathetic consideration and restoration of appeal petition. 9. That the appellant is a law abiding citizen and it is just unfortunate that on account of tragic and compelling circumstances, the appellant was prevented from a reasonable and sufficient cause for making an appearance on the date of hearing and plead mercy. 10. That the requisite fees of ₹ 500/- has been deposited vide challan no.13 dated 20-3-2010 and proof for the same is enclosed. Hence prayed that in the interest of equit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ance on 17.8.2009. 4. In his rival submissions, the ld.D.R., although opposed the recalling of ex parte order, but could not controvert the aforesaid contention of the assessee. 5. After considering the submissions of both the parties, we find that the explanation of the assessee is plausible and are of the opinion that the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause to plead his case on 17.8.2009. We,therefore, recall the ex parte order dated 17.8.2009 and since both the parties agreed to argue the appeal on merit, the appeal is fixed for hearing and after hearing the parties, we proceed to decide the same. 6. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 20.8.2007 of the ld.CIT(A)-I, Lucknow. 7. In this appeal, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... om the AO and applied for the same. 7. That even on merits the learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that in the absence of ownership right in the premises, how come income assessed as rental receipt under 'Income under the Head House Property". 8. That the Appellate Order deserved to be set-aside or such other relief be granted as may be deemed fit and appropriate." 8. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee did not file his return of income. The income was earned as partner in the firm M/s. New Warehouse Carriers, Lucknow. The AO issued the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act,1961. In response to that the assessee filed the return of income on 19.5.2005 declaring total income of ₹ 1,54,016.However,t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... submissions of both the parties and gone through the material available on the record. In the instant case, although the ld. CIT(A) has stated that the case was fixed eight times for hearing, but nowhere it is stated that the assessee did not comply the notices. It is also noticed that the ld.CIT(A) had not decided the appeal on merit, but dismissed the same in limine. We, therefore, deem it appropriate to set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) and remand the case to be decided on merit in accordance with law, after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to co-operate and not to seek unwarranted and unreasonable adjournments. 14. In the result, the Miscellaneous Application is a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates