2018 (2) TMI 630

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent (AR) for the respondent Per: Justice Dr. Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed against order-in-appeal No. 87/2008 dated 15/02/2008. 2.  Heard Ms. Manasi Patil, Learned Counsel for the appellant who submits that she is not contesting the appeal on merits. The only point for consideration in the present appeal is levy of penalty. She submits that in the instant case, penalty was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... LT 176 (Bom)] (v) Commissioner of Central Excise Rohtak v. SB Packaging Ltd. [2008 (223) ELT 360 (P&H) 4. In the light of the well settled legal position, we modify the impugned order and cancelled the levy  of penalty.  Remaining order is upheld. Appellant will get the relief of penalty only. 5. In the result, appeal filed by the appellant is partly allowed. (Dictated and Pronounced .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X