9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 1565X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Advocate for the Appellants Shri Amreesh Jain, AR for the Respondent ORDER Per: Justice ( Dr. ) Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed by the appellant against the Order-in-Original No. 035 to 38-13-14 dated 26.3.2014. Disputed period is Financial year 2006 to 2012. 2. Brief facts of the case are that under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, it is the responsibility of the Airpor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... VR respectfully. According to the OMDA, M/s. GMR / M/s. GVR are entitled to share the revenue collection at the rate of 74% and the Appellant 26%. The airports were handed over to the M/s. GMR / M/s. GVR respectively. After the OMDA, two new entities were developed namely, DIAL (Delhi International Airport Ltd.) and MIAL (Mumbai International Airport Ltd.) The entire airports were handed over to n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e sides and on perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the issue has came up before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in WP(c) 2516 /2008 & 2707/2008 in the case of Delhi International Airport P Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. And Mumbai International Airport P Ltd. vs Union of India & others, where on 14.2.2017, it was observed that - "71. Since we have held that OMDA does not co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
