9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (2) TMI 1332X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oner K. Venkatesh, Government Advocate, for the respondents ORDER Issue notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the compounding notice dated 10.01.2017, issued by the first respondent. 4. By virtue of the impugned notice, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he name Micromax Informatics Limited, New Delhi. 5.2. According to the petitioner, this was an inadvertent error and therefore, the conclusion reached by the respondent that it was a case of inter-state sale was erroneous. 5.3. It is stated that after the impugned order was passed, it indicated, again, erroneously, that numbers available in the IMEI certificate and those which were mentioned on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pondent would pass an order on the representation dated 25.01.2017. 8. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, and perused the records, it appears that an exercise was carried out by the first respondent, which established that the IMEI numbers of all mobile phones, which are 4350 in number, tallied with the list supplied by the Executive Director of the petitioner. The petitioner's ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tive, and thereafter, pass a speaking order; a copy of the same will be supplied to the petitioner. 9.1. Needless to state, the aforementioned exercise will be completed with due expedition, though, not later than 06.02.2017. 10. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed in the aforementioned terms. Resultantly, the connected application is closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
