TMI Blog2007 (8) TMI 785X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent(s) ORAL ORDER Honourable Mr.Justice M.S.Shah This appeal is directed against the ex-parte adinterim order dated 02.08.2007 passed by the Company Law Board, Prinaipal Bench, New Delhi in Company Petition No.111 of 2007, which was earlier challenged by another party in OJ Appeal No.197 of 2007. 2. The said Company Petition No.111 of 2007 is filed before the Company Law Board ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tions including the contention that the present appellant AnandRao Gaekwar (respondent No.3 in the Company Petition) is not a necessary party and that the Company Law Board could not have granted any relief so as to adversely affect the present appellant. 4. We have not permitted the learned counsel to raise any such contentions before us, because the Company Law Board has already given the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er shall be filed by 10.09.2007 and the interlocutory application shall be heard by the Company Law Board as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 30.09.2007. (ii) For the reasons which have already indicated in our order dated 23.08.2007, we expect the Company Law Board to hear and decide the interlocutory application within the above time limit. (iii) It will be open to the present a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
