2018 (6) TMI 917

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r appellant Shri.Sanjay Hasija, Supdt. (AR) for respondent Per: Ramesh Nair 1. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of duty for the period November 1999 to November 2000 invoking the provisions of Rule 95 ZQ (5) (ii) of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules,1944. 2. Shri Prasad Paranjape, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant at the outset submits that the demand was made .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) Angadpal Indl. Pvt. Ltd. - 2015 (325) ELT 228 (SC) f) Valson Dyeing Bleaching & Printing Works - 2010 (259) ELT 33 (Bom) g) Shanti Synthetics & Processors Pvt.Ltd. - Passed in Appeal No.E/24/2011 3. Shri Sanjay Hasija, Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings in the impugned order. 4. He further submits that even if the duty cannot be recovered under .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the Ld. Counsel as well as by the AR and pass a fresh order on the legal issue raised by the appellant, for the first time before this Tribunal. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeals by way of remand to the adjudicating authority for passing a fresh order within three months from the date of receipt of this order. (Pronounced in Court on 24/05/2018)
Case laws, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X