TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 1403X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rjeet Singh JJ. For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi with Mr. Aditya Vijay For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma JUDGMENT 1. In all these appeals, common questions of law and facts are involved, hence they are decided by this common judgment. 2. By way of these appeals, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the tribunal has dismissed the appeals ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case, the finding of the ITAT is perverse "contrary to the record and untenable in the eye of law?" Income Tax Appeal No.29/2005 admitted on 11.03.2005 "(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT was justified in deleting the disallowance of expenditure of interest of Rs. 93,10,524/- when the same was incurred for non business purposes and whether the order of IT ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2005. "(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right and justified in deleting the disallowance of interest of Rs. 1,50,02,953/- made by the Assessing Officer in spite of the fact that admittedly the said expenditure was not debited in the books of accounts as well as in the P & L account of the assessee? (ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|