9911796707
TMI Blog1972 (2) TMI 107X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... elat 1. The order of detention impugned in this petition is in identical terms as the one in Writ Petition 322 of 1971. (Ananta Mukhi @ Ananta Hari v. The State of West Bengal). For the reasons given in the judgment in that petition the impugned order must be held to be bad. Consequently, the respondent state is directed to release the petitioner and set him at liberty forthwith. H.R. Khanna, J. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) read with Sub-section 3 of Section 3 of the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970(President's Act No. 19 of 1970), make: this order directing that the said Shri Firoj Farukee be detained. Given under my hand and seal of office. Sd/-S.L. Bose 3-5-71. District Magistrate, Birbhum. 3. The order of detention was made ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 71. The representation was forwarded by the State. Government to the Advisory Board. The Advisory Board sent its report to the State Government on July 8, 1971. Opinion was expressed by the Advisory Board that there was sufficient cause for the detention of the petitioner. The State Government Confirmed the order of detention on July 21, 1971. 4. The petition has been resisted by the respondents ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e us in the case of Ananta Mukhi alias Ananta Hari v. The state of West Bengal (Writ Petition No. 322 of 1971, decided today) and was rejected. It has been held by us that the use of the word 'Or' in the detention order would not introduce an infirmity as might justify the quashing of that order. 6. It has also been urged that the order of detention was mala fide. There is, however, no ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
