9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 1690X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Advocate for Appellant Shri Rajeev Ranjan, Joint Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary The issue in these appeals is whether the appellant, a manufacturer of sugar and molasses and also having a distillery division, whether Cenvat credit have been rightly denied. Other issue is of denying the benefit of Notification No.67/95-CE on molasses cleared from the sugar mill ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssue herein is squarely covered vide the precedent order of this Tribunal in the case of M/s Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd. Final Order No.A/70392/2016-EX[DB] dated 26th May, 2016 in Appeal No.E/52952/2015-EX[DB]. Under similar facts and circumstances this Tribunal had held as follows:- 6. We have taken the rival contentions into consideration and also have gone through the case records and paper bo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ow cause notice contents that rectified spirit is manufactured in between the process to manufacture denatured spirit and rectified spirit does not find place in Central Excise Tariff with effect from 01.03.2005 and therefore CENVAT credit is not admissible as inputs & input services and capital goods going into manufacture of rectified spirit and hence going into manufacture of denatured spirit. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t is very clear from the observation of Hon'ble Supreme Court that ethyl alcohol and rectification spirit are one and the same. We, therefore, hold that rectified spirit which is not used for human consumption is nothing but ethyl alcohol and is finding place in tariff item no. 22072000. We, therefore, hold that the show cause notice dated 14.08.2013 is not sustainable. As a result, we set aside t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
