Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (12) TMI 1582

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax is recovered in its entirety, the petitioner may suffer serious prejudice - Held that:- In order to balance the interests of both the parties, the respondents are restrained from recovering the balance disputed tax subject to the petitioner paying 50% of the disputed tax within a period of four weeks from today, pending Tax Appeal - While calculating 50% of the disputed tax, the pre-deposit, if .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the disputed tax of ₹ 3,48,64,472/- till the disposal of Tax Appeal No.76 of 2017 pending before the Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam (for short the Tribunal ). 2. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record. 3. The petitioner is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It entered into a development agre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .2 gave effect to the said revision order, vide his order, dated 23.02.2016. The said order was questioned by the petitioner in W.P.No.10263 of 2016. A Division Bench of this Court dismissed the said writ petition and relegated the petitioner to the remedy of appeal. Thereafter, by proceedings, dated 17.06.2016, respondent No.2 passed a rectification order. Assailing the revision order, dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate of Orissa AIR 2000 SC 946 , the petitioner, who had already discharged its tax liability, is not liable to deduct tax at source in respect of payments made to its sub-contractor and that therefore, respondent No.4 has committed patent illegality in re-assessing the tax by exercising suo motu revisional power. 5. Opposing the above submissions, Mr.Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned Special Sta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... both the parties, the respondents are restrained from recovering the balance disputed tax subject to the petitioner paying 50% of the disputed tax within a period of four weeks from today, pending Tax Appeal No.76 of 2017. While calculating 50% of the disputed tax, the pre-deposit, if any, made by the petitioner shall be given credit to. 8. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates