TMI Blog2016 (10) TMI 1242X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ME TAX VERSUS RELIANCE UTILITIES & POWER LTD. [2009 (1) TMI 4 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] to be followed. - Decided against revenue - ITA No. 67 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 26-10-2016 - Jayant Patel And Aravind Kumar, JJ. For the Petitioner : Sri K. V. Aravind For the Respondent : Sri A. Shankar M. Lava JUDGMENT The appellant Revenue has preferred the present appeal by raising the following substantial questions of law :- 1. Whether the Tribunal was correct in deleting the disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D(2)(ii) and 8D (iii) in respect of investments in assets yielding tax free income, holding that the provisions of Section 14A cannot be invoked unless and until there is a receipt of exempted income for the concerned assessment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t and non-interest bearing advances/loans recorded perverse finding ? 4. We permit the learned Advocate to amend the memo of appeal by raising the aforesaid question. 5. As the learned Advocate has restricted the present appeal only on the new question formulated and as question Nos.1 and 2 are not pressed, we find that only aspect to be considered is newly added question. The relevant discussion of the Tribunal on the aforesaid question is at paragraph Nos.22 and 23 which reads as under :- 22. We have perused the orders and heard the rival contentions. Balance sheet of the assessee placed at PB page-53, show its share capital reserved surplus as under; As on 31.03.2008 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng a similar disallowance in the case of Munilal Sales Corpn. Vs CIT 298 ITP 288. Hon ble Apex court reversed the latter in 298 ITR 298 and hence judgment in Abhishek Industries Ltd., will not further revenue s case any way. On the other hand, assessee is well supported by the decision of Hon ble Mumbai High Court in the case of Reliance Utilities Power Ltd., (supra) as well as Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Raghuvir Synthetics Ltd.,(supra). We thus, do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the CIT(A) in this regard. In the result ground 4 of the revenue is dismissed. 6. The aforesaid discussion shows that the Tribunal has found that the decision upon which reliance has been placed by the Revenue in the case o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
