9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 1462X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /Del/2018, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 06.06.2018 and in ITA No.5615/Del/2018 sought to set aside the impugned order dated 19.06.2018 by confirming the penalty order dated 12.05.2017 passed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), by ld. CIT (Appeals), Meerut qua the assessment year 2009-10 on the identical grounds inter alia that :- "1. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has dismiss the Appeal in-limine by saying that the appeal is filed beyond stipulated time as per law. 2. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has not provided the opportunity of bearing heard. 3. That the Appellant is a agriculturist and sold the agriculture land having area of 1.12188 hect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... avit is produced herewith that the assessee have not received the notice" and assessment orders at his address. 11. That the Penalty of Rs. 243600/- has been imposed after completion of assessment. Penalty cannot be imposed after completion of assessment by the assessing officer and during, appeal was dismissed in-limine. The same fact was has held by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT Vs Shadiram Bal Mukund (1972) 84 ITR 183 (All.) and this decision of high court was admitted by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in the case of Mohd Murtaza Ali Vs. Income Tax officer Ward 1(4) Meerut and the copy of decision of' Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is provided herewith." ITA NO.5614/DEL/2018 2. Briefly stated the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the assessment order shows that notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued on 16.03.2016 and notices u/s 142(1) were issued on 16.05.2016 and 08.08.2016 but due to nonappearance of the assessee, AO made the addition on account of unexplained cash deposit of Rs. 10,28,658/- in his saving bank account maintained with Syndicate Bank. From the assessment order, it is also not clear as to what were the reasons, if at all recorded by the AO, for reopening the assessment. Only from the fact that the AO stated to have issued the notice u/s 148 of the Act one can make out that the assessment order has been framed u/s 147 of the Act. Otherwise, reasons recorded have not been mentioned in the assessment order nor in the order passed by the ld. CIT (A). Al ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
