2019 (2) TMI 131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Mr. Justice Amitav K. Gupta For the Petitioner : Mr. B. Poddar, Sr. Advocate, Ms. D. P. Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A., Mr. Vikash Kumar, A.C to G.A. And Mr. Anjani Nandan, Advocate ORAL ORDER PER D.N. PATEL, J. 1. This Writ Petition has been preferred challenging the order of reassessment passed by the respondent authorities, which is dated 23.11.2016 (Anne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ge, under the Jharkhand Value Added Tax, 2005, we see no reason to entertain this Writ Petition. 4. Counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the ground either want of jurisdiction and/ or excess of jurisdiction nor of the limitation in the Writ Petition and thereby he is not inviting orders upon these two points. 5. The petitioner wants to approach the appellate/ revisional authority under the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X