2019 (2) TMI 372

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ht on record to suggest that the aforesaid ruling has ever been over-ruled by any competent judicial authority. This being the case, no interference is called for in the impugned order. - Decided against revenue. - I.T.A. No.6800/Mum/2017 - - - Dated:- 5-2-2019 - Shri Pawan Singh, JM And Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, AM For the Assessee : Mr. Narendra S. Bhawat Ld. AR For the Revenue : .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... with penalty of ₹ 30.82 Lacs vide order dated 29/03/2015. 3. The assessee agitated the penalty with success before first appellate authority vide impugned order dated 19/09/2017. The penalty was deleted since the quantum additions in respect of the which the penalty was levied, was already deleted by the Tribunal vide ITA No. 4007/Mum/2013 order dated 22/05/2015. Aggrieved, the revenue .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X