2014 (1) TMI 1859

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ok Sharma, Additional Solicitor General of India JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned advocate appearing for the appellant. The appellant had filed an appeal in the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal, Bench at Mumbai. That appeal No. E/2535/04-Mumbai, which arose out of an order dated May 14, 2004 of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals), Aurangabad, was p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has also been dismissed and we find that from both orders, no substantial question of law arises within the meaning of section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. When the appellant engaged an advocate and even the advocate did not bother to follow up the matter for eight long years and when it reached hearing, none was present, we do not see how the Tribunal can be faulted for dismissing the app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X