TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 1859X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ances, they prayed that the appeal be restored to file - Held that:- The restoration application has also been dismissed and we find that from both orders, no substantial question of law arises within the meaning of section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. When the appellant engaged an advocate and even the advocate did not bother to follow up the matter for eight long years and when it reache ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... The appellant and the advocate, both were absent. The Tribunal noted that when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. On the earlier date of hearing also none appeared in spite of notice. The notice issued is received back with the postal remark left . In such circumstances, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. An application for restoration was made and i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
