9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 1266X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... person in the course of framing of the Block Assessment in his hands and further even though there were no seized materials indicating payment of on-money with a view to justify the addition of Undisclosed Income in this regard ? (2) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in sustaining the action of the Respondent in framing the Block Assessment in terms of Section 158BD of the Act even though the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court and the decision of this Honourable Court were cited and noticed in the impugned order to support the propositions canvassed on the validity of the Block Assessment framed in the hands of the Appellant ? (3) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in sustaining the action of the Respondent on the jurisdictional issue even though the directions of the Appellate Tribunal while passing the order in the hands of the searched person for initiating and framing of the assessment in the hands of the Appellant in terms of Section 158BD of the Act would not override the mandatory provisions in the said section for recording of satisfaction of Undisclosed Income assessable in the hands of the Appellant while completing the assessment of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... son, the present proceedings under Section 158BD of the Act were undertaken against the mother- Smt.V.Vijayalakshmi. 4. We have heard the learned Counsels for the parties and also given due consideration to their submissions. 5. The relevant findings of the learned Tribunal in the case of appeal of the son-Mr.S.V.Srinivasan- in I.T.(SS) A.No.98/Mds/2004 for Block Assessment Period from 01.04.1995 to 13.09.2001, decided on 03.01.2005, are quoted below for ready reference : "16. We have heard the rival submissions and gone through the case records and seen that the properties purchased in the name of assessee's mother, Smt.V.Vijayalakshmi and she is an existing income-tax assessee since 1991-92 declaring income from money lending and embroidery works etc. No doubt, the seller Shri K.N.Natarajan has admitted that the property was sold for a sum of Rs. 18,50,000/- and even the assessee admitted that he has purchased the property for a sum of Rs. 18,50,000/- as his mother has no sources of income. But despite all these, the Department has conducted search on the business as well as the residential premises of the assessee and could not co-relate this investment with any income ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -2005. In response to this notice the assessee filed her Block Return of Income on 20-02-2006 admitting the undisclosed Income at Rs.NIL. The case was posted for hearing. 2. In response to the notice Shri S.Janardhanan, Chartered Accountant, Pollachi was present. The case was discussed with the assessee's representative on different dates. After scrutinising the details filed by the assessee and after discussing the case with assessee's representative, the case is finalised as under :- 3. During the course of search in the case of Shri S.V.Srinivasan (son of the assessee), it was noticed that an immovable property being land and building was purchased by the assessee on 23.11.1996 from Shri K.N.Natarajan for a stated consideration of Rs. 4,60,000/-. It was also noticed from the seized documents that additional stamp duty of Rs. 1,00,739/- was paid for registering this property on 24- 03-1997. Thus the total stamp duty paid for the purchase of this property (including the stamp paper value) amounts to Rs. 1,95,739/-. On the basis of the stamp duty paid the market value of this property as on the date of the purchase amounts to more than 15 lakhs. Therefore a Sworn Statem ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er though the AO did not write this direction of ITAT in the order; rather he independently recorded the reasons for initiating 158 BD proceedings which are also not incorrect. Thus, in any case, the initiation of action under section 158BD in the case of the appellant is fully justified. 4.1. As regards appellant's claim that no material was found during the course of search relating to 'on money' payment except the statements of seller and purchaser in which there are many contradictions, no addition should be made based on these statements only, I find that AO has rightly mentioned in the order that in view of the decisions as cited by him, the statements recorded during the course of search can be used or making an assessment even though no documents are found during the course of search. In this regard Hon'ble ITAT Chennai Bench ''D'' in the case of Dr.N.Sadasivam and Smt. S.Nirmala Vs.ACIT, Central Circle, IV, Coimbatore in IT (SS) A No.36 and 37 (Mds)/2004, has observed that : '' it is well settled that the statement recorded u/s 132 (4) has got great evidentiary value. The I.T.Act is a specific act and the assessment has to be mad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed after the 30th day of June, 1995, but before the 1st day of January, 1997, serve a notice to such person requiring him to furnish within such time not being less than fifteen days; (ii) in respect of search initiated or books of account or other documents or any assets requisitioned on or after the 1st day of January, 1997, serve a notice to such person requiring him to furnish within such time not being less than fifteen days but not more than forty-five days, as may be specified in the notice a return in the prescribed form and verified in the same manner as a return under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 142, setting forth his total income including the undisclosed income for the block period : Provided that no notice under section 148 is required to be issued for the purpose of proceeding under this Chapter : Provided further that a person who has furnished a return under this clause shall not be entitled to file a revised return; (b) the Assessing Officer shall proceed to determine the undisclosed income of the block period in the manner laid down in section 158BB and the provisions of section 142, sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 143, section 144 and sec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fficient to proceed against the present Assessee-mother - Smt.V.Vijayalakshmi. It is only after the Tribunal passed the order in the said appeal in the case of Shri S.V.Srinivasan on 03.01.2005 that the proceedings under Section 158BD of the Act were initiated against the present Assessee-Smt.V.Vijayalakshmi- on 18.03.2005 in the first instance, as is clear from the above quoted portion of the Assessment Order. Apparently, no objection was raised by the Assessee before the Assessing Authority regarding the necessity to record separate reasons by the Assessing Authority himself before initiating proceedings under Section 158BD of the Act. Even on issuance of letter on 08.09.2006, in Paragraph 4 of the order, the Assessee filed a reply on merits of the sale transaction, but, no question of jurisdiction on account of non-recording of reasons by the Assessing Authority for initiating proceedings under Section 158BD of the Act was raised before the Assessing Authority. It appears, that, for the first time, such objection was raised only before the learned CIT (A), who, vide Paragraph 4 of his order, quoted above, repelled such objections and found that the reasons recorded by the learne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ity, assuming it to be so, though there is nothing on record to indicate otherwise, cannot be said to be fatal for initiating proceedings under Section 158BD of the Act against the mother-present Assessee. 12. A harmonious and combined reading of Sections 158BC and 158 BD of the Act is necessary to give effect to the Scheme of Assessment in the case of Search undertaken against the Assessee to bring to tax the Undisclosed Income under Chapter XIVB of the Act. 13. Therefore, as far as the First Question framed above is concerned, we answer the same in the aforesaid manner against the Assessee and in favour of the Revenue. 14. Adverting to other Questions relating to merits of Additions made in the hands of the present Assessee, we do not find any illegality or perversity in the same, as they remain findings of fact bringing to tax the Undisclosed Income in the hands of the present Assessee under Section 158BD read with Section 158 BC of the Act. 15. Learned counsel for the Appellant/Assessee relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Manish Maheshwari v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (2007) 289 ITR 341, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
