2018 (7) TMI 1922

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... avi Raghavan, Advocate for the Appellant (s) Shri A. K. Biswas, Suptd. (AR) for the Respondent(s) ORDER Per Bench: The issue relates to demand of Rs. 1,81,321/- alongwith interest and equivalent penalty against the Appellant. The demand has been confirmed on the shortage of finished goods on the date of visit of the Central Excise Officers, i. e. on 06.02.1992. In this matter, the Ld. Appellat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to 26.05.1995 there is no question of any interest payable. The appellant also prays that penalty be dropped. 3. The Authorized Representative for the revenue supported the order of the authorities below. 4. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 5. We have heard both sides. The counsel for the appellant fairly submits that since the matter is very old and no documents will be availab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X