Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (5) TMI 1221

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt has pressed the question no.(a) and (b) which are formulated by means of present revision. Questions of law which reads as follows: a. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the instant case, the Member Tribunal was legally justified in imposing tax on the turnover of old, discarded materials (Stores) at the rate of 10% while the same were covered by Notification No.1225 dated 31.03.1992? b. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the instant case the Tribunal was legally justified in not allowing the benefit of declaration certificate of C.S.D. filed before him along with application under Section 12B while the same was received after filling the second appeal before the Tribunal? 4. The brief facts of the case are that the ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ure and importer was 8%. The rate of tax so mentioned at serial no.32 of the notification dated 07.09.1981 was amended vide the notification No.1225 dated 31.03.1992 and the said Entry at serial no.32 in column 4 for the word and figure '6%', the words and figure '4%' was substituted with effect from 1st April, 1992. 11. The Entry at serial no.32 in notification dated 7th September, 1981 and amended notification dated 31st March, 1992 reads as follows: [14] STII5785/ X10( 1)80UP Act XV/48Order81, dt. 7.9.1981 "32. Old, discarded, unserviceable or obsolete machinery, stores or vehicles including waste products except cinder, coal ash and such items as are included in any other notification issued under the Act." [221] .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appealThe assessee shall not be entitled to produce additional evidence, whether oral or documentary, [before the Appellate Authority or the Tribunal except] where the evidence sought to be adduced is evidence, which the Assessing Authority had wrongly refused to admit or which after exercise of due diligence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him before the Assessing Authority, and in every such case, upon the additional evidence being taken on record, reasonable opportunity for challenge or rebuttal shall be given to the [Commissioner]." 16. From perusal of the contents of Section 12B of the Act, it is crystal clear that the said additional evidence can be placed or produced by the assessee, whether oral or documen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates