Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

Availment of ITC

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Dear experts, I have some queries in sec 17(5) . Sec 17(5)(d) reads as below goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business. Explanation. For the purposes of clauses (c) and (d), the expression construction includes re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalisation, to the said immovable property; Here my doubt is, it is clearly said that credit relating to construction is immovable property is not eligible. Then why real estate people are claiming credit of ITC paid by them .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on flats sold before completion certificate. But if immovable property is constructed for letting out purposes then the same ITC is not available for the business. Please clarify this. (In recent judgement of high court it was said that credit on immovable property which was used for letting out can also be claimed) 2019 (5) TMI 1278 - ORISSA HIGH COURT So i request the members to put forward some valid points regarding this. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Strings are attached to availment of ITC for construction of property. What are those strings you understand very well, since you are yourself expert. Regarding the decision of Orissa High Court mentioned by you, I am sure the department will not accept the judgmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t and file appeal/writ petition with the Supreme Court. We are to go by the Act and not any decision of any court inasmuch as any judgement can be set aside by the higher court. So it is better to understand the language of the Act in our interest as well as our client's interest.. So I request you to do xray of Section 17 (5) of CGST before arriving at any decision. Nothing is out of reach for you. - Reply By SHARAD ANADA - The Reply = Builder is providing works contract services to his customers. PL refer definition of works contract u/s 2(119) of CGST ACT 2017 (119) works contract means a contract for building, construction, fabrication,completion, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modificati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on, repair,maintenance, renovation, alteration or commissioning of any immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) is involved in the execution of such contract; Sec 17(5) does not block credit of wc services used in providing works contract services. Refer sec 17(5)(c) (c) works contract services when supplied for construction of an immovable property(other than plant and machinery) except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service; - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = There is a world of difference between Construction Service and Works Contract Service. - Reply By Prudhvi Jakkula - The Reply = Thank you sethi ji for your answer. But it i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s not good for anyone to mock others without any reason. Anyways coming to the words of section, it is mentioned that credit is not available in case of construction of immovable property on his own account . My main concern is whether that own account implies self purpose(means using as office) or any other meaning is there for that word - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Dear Sh.Prudhvi Jakkula Ji, It was not my intention to hurt your feelings. Really I have a great regard for your knowledge. I like your replies from the core of my heart. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = It is not my temperament to scoff at others. I am an introvert person. All experts in this forum know my nature .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . I have been sharing my knowledge and experience in this forum since retirement. Still I do not consider myself perfect as learning is a lifelong process.I can learn from youngster. - Reply By Himansu Sekhar - The Reply = Dear friend, Hon'ble Court has specifically denied to make the respective clause of Section 17(5) Ultra vires. Kasturi Sir advises to go to the provisions of the Section. The provisions are clear. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Dear Sh.Himansu Sekhar Ji, I agree with you completely. I have expressed department's bent of mind. The matter will travel to the Supreme Court, it being interpretational dispute. Why have you stop .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ped contributing to this forum ? I relish your views on any issue. It is not difficult to spare sometime for sharing your knowledge on this forum. Thanks regards, K.L.SETHI - Reply By Prudhvi Jakkula - The Reply = Dear sethi sir, I respect you very much. Sorry if my words created inconvenience to you. Even your scoldings are considered as blessings. Such a knowledgeable person you are. Any ways thank you again for clarifying that ITC issue. - Reply By Nandan Khambete - The Reply = Dear All, if you read Section 17(5) above again, Construction is to be considered only to the extent it is capitalised . Flat/ Construction .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by Builders, it is not capitalised in their books. It is Inventory. Hence they can take ITC. Hope the above is clear. Regards - Reply By Prudhvi Jakkula - The Reply = Dear Nandan sir, You hit directly to the bird's eye. Thank you for providing clarification. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Actually idiom is 'to hit bull's eye' and NOT 'bird's eye'. - Reply By Prudhvi Jakkula - The Reply = Sethi ji thank you again for correcting me. ☺️☺️☺️☺️ - Reply By Himansu Sekhar - The Reply = Thank you Sethi sir, I shall continue sparing some time. My profile has also been disabled. - Availment of ITC - Query Started By: - Prudhvi Jakkula Dated:- 27- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6-2019 Goods and Services Tax - GST - Got 14 Replies - GST - Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing, reply post by an expert, personal opinion Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates