9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (7) TMI 1014X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndent ORDER Per : S.S GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 6.4.2018 passed by the Commissioner (A), whereby the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of sugar and molasses falling under Chapter 17 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are availin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... issioner vide Order-in-Original dated 21.11.2016 disallowed and ordered for recovery of CENVAT credit of Rs. 16,66,248/- wrongly availed and utilized by the appellant along with appropriate interest and imposed equal penalty under Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (A) who rejected the same. 3. This appeal was listed for final argu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of Bijapur, the appellant has reversed only an amount of Rs. 16,55,919/- and balance of Rs. 10,329/- is yet to be paid by the appellant along with interest and penalty. Since there is discrepancy in the reversal of the CENVAT credit, the matter is remanded to the Original Authority for verification of the same. If on verification, it is found that the appellant has reversed less amount, then the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
