Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (7) TMI 1508

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... res owed to the Assignor - The existence of debt is further established by various instruments for the creation of security interest for the loans availed by the Corporate Debtor such as the Additional and Third Supplement Memorandum of Entry dated 22.6.2012 and the Extension of Charge of Hypothecation dated 22.6.2012 that are annexed to the Petition. Further, the Petitioner has also annexed the Pledge of Shares Agreement dated 22.6.2012 created in favour of the Financial Creditors of the Corporate Debtor. It is an admitted fact that the Petitioner has initiated proceedings before the Ld. DRT in the year 2014 and the same has still pending adjudication. The date of default, as stated by the Petitioner in Form 1, is 31.3.2013, i.e. the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3. The Assignor vide its various Sanction Letters dated 19.1.2005, 22.2.2008, 31.3.2009, 6.11.2009 and 18.5.2012 granted the following credit facilities to the Corporate Debtor: Facilities Amount in ₹Crore Cash Credit 9.7/- Term Loan 6.3/- Term Loan 3.53/- Term Loan 4.94/- FITL 5.49/- Total .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed of Guarantee dated 22.6.2012. 7. The Petitioner sent a notice dated 5.8.2016 under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 intimating the default of ₹50,44,37,258/- and calling for repayment of the same. The Petitioner sent a recall notice dated 15.3.2018 demanding repayment of ₹69,70,15,694/- from Corporate Debtor. 8. The Corporate Debtor has sent a letter dated 19.3.2018 to the Petitioner stating that as per its accounts an amount of ₹29,57,03,995/- is due to be repaid against the loan as on 31.3.2013 and offered one-time settlement amount of ₹10 crores. The Petitioner in its reply dated 26.3.2018 has rejected the one-time settlement offer. The Corporate Debtor further revised its OTS .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 20.26 crores owed to the Assignor. The Corporate Debtor entered into the Addendum to Master Restructuring Agreement dated 22.6.2012for an amount of ₹5.49 crores owed to the Assignor. 14. The existence of debt is further established by various instruments for the creation of security interest for the loans availed by the Corporate Debtor such as the Additional and Third Supplement Memorandum of Entry dated 22.6.2012 and the Extension of Charge of Hypothecation dated 22.6.2012 that are annexed to the Petition. Further, the Petitioner has also annexed the Pledge of Shares Agreement dated 22.6.2012 created in favour of the Financial Creditors of the Corporate Debtor. 15. The restructuring agreements and var .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... w cannot be said to be time-barred. Therefore, the contention of the Corporate Debtor about the claim being time-barred is not maintainable. 18. Given the above facts and circumstances, the debt and default of more than one Lakh Rupees by the Corporate Debtor is established. 19. The Petitioner has proposed the name of Mr Gaurav Ashok Adukia, a registered insolvency resolution professional having Registration Number [IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00457/2017-18/11293] as Interim Resolution Professional, to carry out the functions as mentioned under I B Code, and given his declaration; no disciplinary proceedings are pending against him. 20. The CP 2987/2018 filed under sub-section (2) of Section 7 of I B Cod .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... struction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002; d) the recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by or in possession of the corporate debtor. II. That the supply of essential goods or services to the corporate debtor, if continuing, shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during the moratorium period. III. That the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of I B Code shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator. IV. That the order of moratorium shall have effect from the date of this order till the com .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates