TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 1834X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s been taken by respondent No.2 on his application so far - HELD THAT:- It is appropriate that respondent No.2 considers release of the seized vehicle. Since the petitioner has already submitted his application, dated 01.12.2015, to the said respondent, he is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders as per the aforementioned G.Os. for release of the seized vehicle within a period ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on of sand and that he has made an application, dated 01.12.2015, to respondent No.2, who is the competent authority, for release of the seized vehicle. The petitioner s grievance is that no action has been taken by respondent No.2 on his application so far. At the hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for both parties that as per G.O.Ms.No.3, Industries Commerce (Mines-I) Departmen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
