Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (5) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. 2006. The petitioner has aggrieved over the same. 3. The Petitioner had purchased consignments of Vitrified Tiles etc from a Supplier/Seller from a dealer of Gujarat namely Metro City Tiles Pvt. Ltd., Morbi, Gujarat. 4. These goods were being transported in two different vehicles. The vehicles along with the consignment were detained on 19.07.2013 by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer/Check Post Officer of Thoppur check Post, Thoppur Inward, Kurinji Nagar, Dharmapuri District. 5. The reasons given at time of detention are as follows:- (a) A transaction of sale liable to tax has taken place and that the tax payable in respect of the sale has not been paid. (b) The sale of the goods has, for the purpose of payment of tax, not been pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the goods from other state with an intention to evade the payment of taxes on their 1st sale in the state of Tamil Nadu which warrants action under section 71 of the Act with the compounding option under section 72 (1) (a) of the TNVAT Act. b) The R.Cs issued to the dealers under both acts (TIN : 33722029372 and CST 1091928) were already cancelled by the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Thudialur Circle, Coimbatore with effect from 31.12.2012 vide proceedings in TIN 33722029372/2012-2013 dated 27.02.2013 (Copy enclosed) for the reason that the dealers were not doing business for which the Registration Certificate were issued. When the goods are transported from other state after the cancellation of the registration certificate of the dealer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 55, 122/- as tax and the compounding fee of Rs. 1,10,244/- and tax of Rs. 91,879/- and compounding fee of Rs. 1,83,758/-. 9. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner's registration was not cancelled and to this effect the Petitioner's reference to extract from the Tax Information Exchange System taken on 05.08.2013 which shows the Petitioner's Registration was valid and subsisting events on 16.03.2013 and a similar extract from the Commercial Tax Department of Tamil Nadu Website dated 05.08.2013 showing the status of the Petitioner as active. 10.  On behalf of the Respondents, it was also submitted that the Petitioner has an alternate remedy under th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Thudaliyur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore revealed that the petitioner was not doing business at M.G Complex, 297 Sivanatham Road, Rathinapuri Coimbatore which is the place of business in the registration issued to the petitioner.   15. It is further submitted that the name of the consignee was Metro Tiles Private Limited, Morbi and Sunshine Tiles Co Private Limited Gujarat and on verification it was noticed that the petitioner had effected interstate purchase for a value of Rs. 28, 20, 715 and Rs. 6, 98, 019/-during the assessment years 2012-13 and assessment years 2013-14. For the aforesaid interstate transaction the petitioner was required to have paid tax at 14.5% for an amount of Rs. 4, 09, 65/-and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mpugned draft compounding notices dated 24.7.2013 for compounding of the of the offences specified in Section 71 of the Act. 21. There are however several disputed questions of fact on several counts. There is a disputeas to whether the petitioner's VAT and CST registration were valid and subsisting or were cancelled at the time of the detention of the goods. 22. Therefore, while upholding the exercise of power by the 1st respondent, I am inclined set aside the impugned order in so far as it seeks to demand compounding/composition fee. I therefore remit the case back to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Accordingly, the impugned order is partially set aside to that extent. 23. The petitioner m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates