TMI Blog2020 (9) TMI 635X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eposited, however, learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny the document Annexure R-2/5 which is an electronically generated document which depicts that the E-way bill dated 04.01.2020 was rejected by the complainant on 05.01.2020. He is also not able to explain as to what was the necessity of depositing the GST on the rejected bill. The petitioner prima facie appears to hav ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... edunder Sections 420, 467 471 of IndianPenal Code, 1860 at Police Station Saha, District Ambala. The FIR has been lodged on the basis that a fake E-way bill was generated for an amount of ₹ 1,79,200/-. The counsel for the petitioner would contend an amount of ₹ 9,600/- was paid as GST and hence there was no question of the E-way bill being fake. Qua the dishonoring of the cheques, l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as also annexed with the reply the statement of one Mange Ram, the driver of the vehicle No. HR- 37-C-2981 in which the goods alleged to have been sent by the petitioner were loaded. According to this, the said Mange Ram has stated that he never delivered any such goods to the complainant. On similar lines, a reply has been filed by the counsel for the complainant. Additionally, in the reply fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5.01.2020. He is also not able to explain as to what was the necessity of depositing the GST on the rejected bill. The petitioner prima facie appears to have not only fabricated the E-way bill but has also, in order to create evidence, filed his GST returns on a bill which stood rejected by the complainant on the very next day. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. It is, how ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
