TMI Blog2016 (4) TMI 1396X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SUPREME COURT ] needs reconsideration. We do not propose to state reasons in detail at this stage so as to see that it may not prejudicially affect the hearing of the matters. Suffice it is to mention that the majority view has not taken into consideration some binding precedents and more particularly, we find that there was no discussion among the members of the Bench before pronouncement of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... October, 2013 and thereafter, it was brought to the notice of the Bench that Civil Appeal No.4060/2009 and connected matters involving an identical issue, had been referred to a Five-Judge Bench. Accordingly, on 21st January, 2016, these review petitions were ordered to be heard by a Five-Judge Bench. On 21st January, 2016, notice was ordered to be served through substituted service and in pur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reconsideration. We do not propose to state reasons in detail at this stage so as to see that it may not prejudicially affect the hearing of the matters. For this purpose we have kept in mind the following observations appearing in the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in Sheonandan Paswan (supra) as under: .... If the Review Bench of the apex court were required to give reasons, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... note that all the three Judges of the Review Bench were unanimous in taking the view that any decision of the facts and circumstances which constitutes errors apparent on the face of record and my reasons for the findings that these facts and circumstances constitute errors apparent on the face of record resulting in the success of the review petition, may have the possibility of prejudicing th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
