9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 725X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rguments, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the respondent Baskaran is no more. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is not having instruction in this regard and that their attempts to elicit information from their counterpart did not yield any result. 3. It is seen that Baskaran filed S.T.C.No.449 of 2011 against the petitioner b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Ex.D.1 to Ex.D.5 were marked. The Court below by Judgment dated 05.06.2013 found the accused guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one year and imposed fine of Rs. 5,000/-.Aggrieved by the same, the accused filed Crl.A.No.40 of 2013 before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni. The comp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... no objection for the legal heirs of the complainant to take the said amount. The petitioner is also willing to deposit a further sum of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to the credit of S.T.C.No.449 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The legal heirs of Baskaran can withdraw the same. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner is reduced to Rs. 50,000/-. The petitioner is given eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to deposit the said amount. The legal heirs of the complainant can withdraw the amount of Rs. 50,000/- already deposited by the accused and the amount of Rs. 50,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner. e) If the petitioner fails to pay the compensation amount of Rs. 50,000/-, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
