2017 (11) TMI 1921

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ORDER Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, Learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State. 2. The facts of the case are not in dispute. The petitioner was carrying goods from Nagpur, State of Maharashtra to the State of Uttar Pradesh. The goods have been seized upon entering the State of Uttar Pradesh on the pretext that the E-way Bill was not presented .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dation of GST Council that till 31st of March, 2018 the demand of an E-way Bill will not be made. The demand itself and the consequential demand of cash security is not justified. 6. We therefore, direct the respondents to release the goods of the petitioner forthwith subject to deposit of security to the extent of 50% of the value of goods in the shape of other than cash or bank guarantee, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X