TMI Blog2020 (12) TMI 743X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat on 30th August, 2018, the respondent no. 2 passed a detention order under Section 129(1) of the U.P. GST Act. It is stated that on 4.2.2019, respondents had issued a demand notice to the petitioner directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 21,10,032/-. The petitioner claims that it is on this date that the petitioner became aware of the said demand and met the respondent requesting him ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the date of communication as 4.2.2019 is not believable, as such the appeal was dismissed. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the said order dated 23.9.2019, as the Tribunal envisaged under the Act has not been constituted and the petitioner claims that in the absence of such constitution, the petitioner cannot be left remedy less. He has placed strong reliance on the judgm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|