TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 1871X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... RDER John Michael Cunha, J. 1. Petitioners have sought to set aside the order, dated 9-11-2011 passed by the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bengaluru, in C.C. No. 332/2011 whereby the Learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Sections 9 and 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short 'the Act') and has issued summons to the petitioners. 2. Learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. 5. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The impugned order, dated 9-11-2011 in C.C. No. 332/2011 is set aside. The proceedings initiated against the petitioners in C.C. No. 332/2011 are quashed for the present reserving liberty to the respondent to initiate appropriate action depending upon the result of the proceedings pending before the Customs, Excise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|