2021 (6) TMI 798

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... USTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY APPELLANTS: SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL ADVOCATE RESPONDENT: SMT. SHRADHA RAJGURU, ADVOCATE JUDGMENT The present writ appeal is arising out of the order dated 13.07.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.8252/2020. 2. The facts of the case reveal that the respondent herein has preferred an application under Sabka Vishwas (L .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... allowed the writ petition and the matter was remanded back to the Committee to pass an appropriate order after granting an opportunity of personal hearing to respondent herein. 3. Paragraph 6 of the order of the learned Single Judge reads as under: "6. The principal contention of Shri. Shivdas is that petitioner has paid tax as per Annexure-F and the same has not been considered. The stand of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... petitioner, consider the material on record and pass fresh orders in accordance with law; and (c) It is made clear that petitioner shall get only one opportunity of being heard. Petition is disposed of. No costs." 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, the order passed by the learned Single Judge does not warrant interference. The respondent herein has contended before the learned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X