2021 (8) TMI 179

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce S.M.Subramaniam For the Petitioner : Mr.C.Yokesh For the Respondents : Mr.V.Veluchamy (For R1 & R2) (Government Advocate), Mr.K.Sathishkumar (For R3 & R4) (Standing Counsel for TASMAC) ORDER The order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(MD).No.4261 of 2014 is placed before this Court. The demand made in the present case is on account of the retrospective operation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nal and unenforceable in law. When the case came up before the Division Bench, the counsel for the Revenue submitted that the retrospective demands stands waived in view of the Notification issued by the Government dated 21.04.2015. Recording the same, the said writ petition was disposed of. 3.The learned counsel for the respondent TASMAC represented that the petitioner has challenged only the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X