Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2013 (1) TMI 1019

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE 15-01-2013 FOR THE APPELLANT : BY ADV. SRI.RAJU K.MATHEWS FOR THE RESPONDNT : ADV. SRI.LAL GEORGE JUDGMENT The petitioner was a Life Insurance Corporation(LIC) agent who later on resigned with effect from 31/12/2008. The writ petition is filed since the subsequent commission on renewal premiums were not paid by the Corporation. The petitioner also altern .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 44(1) arises only if all the conditions stipulated are complied and in terms of the Section 44(1) (c) of the Insurance Act, there is no obligation to pay the commission if the agent who was inclusively working for LIC for 10 years resigns and join a competitive company. In this regard it is contended that the above position is covered by the judgment of learned Single Judge in Baby John v. Life I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anding anything to the contrary contained in any contract between any person and an insurance agent providing for the forfeiture or stoppage of payment of renewal commission to such insurance agent, no such person shall, in respect of life insurance business transacted in India, refuse payment to an insurance agent of commission due to him on renewal premium under the agreement by reason only of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ental rights of the person involved. 5. That apart under normal circumstances when an agency is terminated, the agent is not entitled for any future commission. But the statute by virtue of Section 44(1) of Act has recognised such a right. Therefore the restriction imposed by the statute by virtue of proviso (c) is only reasonable cannot termed as illegal. Hence the petitioner is not entitled f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates