Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (9) TMI 493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the provisions of Section 11B of the Act are not applicable to the facts of the case to allege time limit prescribed under Section 11B of the Act is applicable to the facts of this case. The same view was taken by the Hon ble High Court of Karnataka in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BANGALORE VERSUS KVR CONSTRUCTION [ 2012 (7) TMI 22 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] as well as the Hon ble Ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion of DG sets, the appellant recovered certain amount on account of transportation of DG sets but actually paid less amount to the transporters as compared to the amount collected from the buyer during the period 2004-2005. It was alleged that appellant is liable to pay duty on transportation charges over and above the actual payment made to the transporters, therefore, the proceedings were initi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 10 has clearly stated that the amount paid by the appellant is not a duty therefore provision of 11B and time limit prescribed under Section 11B of the Act is not applicable to the facts of this case. To support this contention he relied on the decision of the Hon ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Commissioner of C.Ex Bangalore Vs. KVR Construction reported in 2012 (26) S.T.R. 195 (Kar. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e refund claim has been filed by the appellant is duty or a deposit ? 6. To ascertain the said fact, the order dated 19.01.2010 passed by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) is to be considered, wherein the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has held as under In the above, it can be concluded that in present case, the appellant was bound to the removal goods to their buyers at the agreed deed. Though, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case as the said case law deals with refund of duty, therefore, I hold that refund claim filed by the appellant is not barred by limitation. 8. Accordingly, the same is entertainable. Therefore, I set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal with consequential relief, if any. 9. The appeal is disposed of in the above manner. (Dictated and pronounced in the open court) - - TaxTMI .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates