TMI Blog2017 (12) TMI 1812X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... irector (Discipline) has already completed the process of examining the petitioner s complaint. This Court is of the view that the present petition is unmerited and wholly unjustified. This court is also of the view that such frivolous petitions ought to be discouraged - Petition dismissed with cost quantified at ₹10,000/-. - W.P.(C) 10536/2017 - - - Dated:- 4-12-2017 - MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, J. Petitioner: Mr R Subramaniam, Advocate. Respondents: Ms Pooja M. Saigal, Advocate. ORDER CM Nos. 43119/2017 43120/2017 1. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications are disposed of. W.P.(C) 10536/2017 and CM No. 43118/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the present pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... In the meanwhile, the petitioner sent an e-mail dated 31.10.2017 to the Director Discipline Committee of ICAI, inter alia, stating as under:- 31.10.2017 Mr C S Ravi Director Disc Committee Sir Now that the matter is for consideration under Rule 9 request earliest disposal of the same As you are aware in LPA 440/2017 in the batch of 4 matters your office had agreed to complete the complete Rule 9 stage DD and DC/ BOD within 14 weeks We hope the same time line can be adopted here We would be grateful for your confirmation in this regard so that needless litigation on such issue is averted Rgds T Sharath Babu Director Sir, With reference to the trailing mail below, it is to inform that we have rece ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eeks, thereby constraining the Petitioner to approach this Hon ble Court by filing the present Petition seeking that the 2nd Respondent be directed to complete the enquiry under Rule 8 and Rule 9 within a maximum of 14 weeks from date and in the failure thereof to remand the proceedings to the 2nd Respondent for detailed enquiry under Rule 18. Hence, the present petition. 10. Ms Pooja M Saigal, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there are several complaints which are pending enquiry, and the petitioner's complaint would be taken on its own turn. 11. It is seen from the above that there is no undue delay in processing the complaint filed by the petitioner and thus there was no cause for the petitioner to have approach ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
