TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 1975X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... centive above that amount is required to bear greater scrutiny - HELD THAT:- The petitioner has already received the benefit to the extent of ₹1 crore and now claims the benefit for the remaining amount of ₹28.17 crores. In view of the decision in M/s Weldone Exim Pvt. Ltd. [ 2018 (4) TMI 979 - DELHI HIGH COURT] , the petitioner would be entitled to the said amount, subject to the res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... irector General Foreign Trade- DGFT), whereby the petitioner s claim for duty credit scrips under the Incremental Export Incentivisation Scheme (IEIS), on an annual basis, for the exports made during the year 2013-14, has been rejected. The petitioner had claimed a sum of ₹29.17 crores as benefits under the IEIS. However, the same has been restricted by the respondents to ₹1 crore, on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d and speaking order. The application would not be rejected on the ground that total amount being claimed exceeded ₹ 1 crore during the financial year 2013-14. However, the greater scrutiny in terms of clause (ii) of paragraph 3.15.5 (c) read with paragraph 3.8.3 (e) (ii) would be undertaken. The aforesaid exercise would be completed within 10 weeks from the date copy of this order is served ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... out greater scrutiny. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 16.11.2018 is set aside. The order dated 30.01.2018 passed by respondent no.3 (Addl. DGFT), rejecting the petitioner s appeal is also set aside. The respondents are directed to re-examine the petitioners request for export incentives in terms of the decision of the Division Bench of this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
