2022 (2) TMI 371

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iti, Mr. Sukalpa Seal For the Customs Authority. Mr. Kaushik Dey For the Respondent ORDER Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned adjudication order dated 21st September, 2021 being Annexure P-9 to the writ petition passed by the Joint Commissioner of Customs (Port)/respondent No.3 on the ground that the same was passed i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h are substantiated by sufficient documents and which are the part of this writ petition. Considering the submission of the parties and admitted facts which emerged on perusal of relevant documents annexed to the writ petition, I am of the view that there is a gross violation of principle of natural justice in the case of the petitioner in course of impugned adjudication proceedings and at the ti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... whose statement the respondent concerned wants to rely in the impugned adjudication proceedings. It is recorded that this court has set aside the impugned adjudication order only on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice and has not gone into the merits of the case itself. It is expected that the respondent concerned will dispose of the case of the petitioner expeditiously and w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X