TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 1435X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , the Court was not justified in adjudicating the issue at the first instance when there is a statutory scheme provided for adjudication of such issues by the competent authorities concerned. In that view of the matter, without expressing any further opinion, the judgment is set aside. The parties are relegated to the competent authority under the Indian Stamp Act in the State of Uttar Pradesh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... payable by the developer and the allottees Under Sections 33/47(A) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. 4. In a writ petition filed by the developer, in respect of the bipartite agreement between the State and the developer, the High Court by judgment dated 4th August, 2011 relegated the developer to the competent authority. However, in the writ petitions filed by the allottees of the developer, by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the issue at the first instance when there is a statutory scheme provided for adjudication of such issues by the competent authorities concerned. 6. In that view of the matter, without expressing any further opinion, we set aside the judgment dated 16.8.2011 in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 73277 of 2010 and other connected matters. The parties are relegated to the competent authority u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r matters are consequently before the High Court. 8. Therefore, we express no opinion on the legality or otherwise of the orders passed by the competent authorities, since it is for the parties to take up all available contentions before the High Court and it is for the High Court to pass appropriate orders. 9. Having regard to the fact that the issue has been pending since long, we request ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
