Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (4) TMI 899

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not entitled to this privilege. Further, section 253(6) of the Act states that the appeal to the appellate tribunal need to be filed in the prescribed form and it is also to be verified in the prescribed manner. Meanwhile Rule 47(1) of the I.T. Rules also clarifies that appeal shall be signed by a person specified in sub-rule (3) of Rule 45. Rule 45(3) states that the form of appeal referred to subrule (1) to be verified by a person who is authorized to verified by the person who is authorised to verify the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act, as applicable to the assessee. According to the provisions of section 140(c) of the Act states that in case of a company, where the appeal is to be verified by the managing direct .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... normal provision of Income Tax and considered the same material for reopening U/s 147 of the I.T. Act 1961 is only change of opinion which is not permitted under the Income Tax Act 1961. The CIT-A erred in re-opening the assessment passed U/s 143(3) without bring on record any new material which has come to his possession for validity reopening the assessment. Hence, the reassessment is bad in law for want of requisite jurisdiction The CIT-A erred in confirming the addition which was passed without following the H'ble Supreme Court decision in GKN Drive Shaft (India) Ltd v/s ITO, 259 ITR 19 and also the Jurisdictional Tribunal decision in A.S.Chinnaswamy Raju v/s ACIT in ITA No.13559/B/2010, dt.25.07.2016 as the mandatory require .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d fully all the material facts necessary for the assessment. 2. The CIT (A) failed to appreciate that the appellant having the filed the return of income on 18.11.2008 the addition of provision for bad and doubt debts to the calculation of book profit in terms of clause (i) of the Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the I.T. Act being retrospective from 01.04.2009 clearly the said clause did not exist at the time of filing the return of income. 3. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in holding the re-opening of assessment U/s 147 as valid ignoring the fact that the notice U/s 148 has been issued by the AO on the basis of Audit Objection. Thus the notice issued U/s 148 is bad in law and order passed under re-assessment be cancelled. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the return holds a valid Power of Attorney from the individual to do so, then it shall be attached to the return. Thus it is noted that if due to one reason or the other individual cannot personally sign the return, then an option has been given to get it signed by a valid Power of Attorney holder and further such PoA should be attached to the return. Clause ( b ) of section 140 deals with the signing of the return of HUF. According to this clause the return shall be signed by the karta, and where the karta is absent from India or is mentally incapacitated from attending to his affairs, then by any other adult member of such family. The option given as per clause ( a ) for getting the return signed by a valid Power of Attorney holder is not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of any other association, the return shall be signed and verified, by any member of the association or the principal officer thereof. 7. On going through various clauses of section 140, it is seen that whereas clauses ( a ) and ( c ) contain the provision for the signing of the return by a valid power of attorney holder, other clauses do not have such provision. Thus there is a clear line of demarcation between the classes of assessees, who, in certain circumstances, can get their returns signed and verified by the holder of valid PoA, in which case such PoA is required to be attached to the return and on the other hand the classes of assessees who do not enjoy such privilege. It is not permissible to a non-privileged assessee to issue .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... being heard on that ground. [Emphasis supplied] 9. Further, section 253(6) of the Act states that the appeal to the appellate tribunal need to be filed in the prescribed form and it is also to be verified in the prescribed manner. Meanwhile Rule 47(1) of the I.T. Rules also clarifies that appeal shall be signed by a person specified in sub-rule (3) of Rule 45. Rule 45(3) states that the form of appeal referred to subrule (1) to be verified by a person who is authorized to verified by the person who is authorised to verify the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act, as applicable to the assessee. According to the provisions of section 140(c) of the Act states that in case of a company, where the appeal is to be verified by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates